In Atomfall, the FX-8120 is slower than the Core i9-11900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $383 cheaper!
FX-8120
- Up to 91% cheaper – $38.10 vs $420.99
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $1.81/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 232 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
188 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
81%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
174 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
