Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $78.02 vs $849.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-13400F - $1.32 vs $9.04 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 59% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8120 - 94 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7020 minutes ago
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7019 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |