Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $78.02 vs $143.57
- Up to 33% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-12400 - $0.40 vs $0.60 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 22% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8120 - 238 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6852 minutes ago
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6852 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |