The FX-8120 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $7.62 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 10% cheaper – $70.40 vs $78.02
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$70.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8120 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
