In Rust, the FX-6350 is same performance as the FX-8300. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $55 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Is 6 months and 5 days newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 months and 5 days newer
- Up to 52% cheaper – $51.29 vs $106.06
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $0.50/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Rust
FX-8300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
48%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
