In Helldivers 2, the FX-6350 is slightly slower than the FX-4300 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $2 more expensive!
FX-6350
- Is 6 months and 5 days newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 months and 5 days newer
FX-4300
- Up to 1% faster in Helldivers 2 – 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Helldivers 2
- Up to 4% cheaper – $49.00 vs $51.29
- Up to 4% cheaper
- Up to 7% better value in Helldivers 2 – $0.25 vs $0.27/FPS
- Up to 7% better value in Helldivers 2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Helldivers 2 FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
189 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
93%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
