In Deathloop, the FX-6350 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $139 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper – $51.29 vs $189.99
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop – $0.23 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
26%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
