In Atomfall, the FX-6350 is slightly faster than the Core i7-640M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i7-640M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-640M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-640M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 26th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $346.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
