In Rust, the FX-6350 is slower than the Core i7-13700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $319 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 86% cheaper – $51.29 vs $369.99
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $1.38/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Rust
Core i7-13700
- Up to 29% faster in Rust – 268 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i7-13700: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
208 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
48%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
268 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
84 FPS
100%
Price, $
$369.99
13%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
