In Starfield, the FX-6350 is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 3% faster in Starfield – 94 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Starfield
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
91 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
85%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
