In Rust, the FX-6350 is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 255 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
210 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
55%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
