In Atomfall, the FX-6350 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $48 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 48% cheaper – $51.29 vs $98.95
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $0.27 vs $0.54/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
182 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
97%
Price, $
$98.95
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
50%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
