In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-6350 is slightly faster than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $98 cheaper!
FX-6350
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 66% cheaper – $51.29 vs $149.35
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.21 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i3-14100
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
217 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
91%
Price, $
$149.35
34%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
