In Rust, the FX-6350 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $22 more expensive!
FX-6350
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 43% cheaper – $29.00 vs $51.29
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Rust – $0.13 vs $0.24/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-6350 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
56%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
54%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
