In Atomfall, the FX-6300 is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1230. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6300
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1230
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Xeon E3-1230: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
98%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E3-1230 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E3-1230 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
