In Atomfall, the FX-6300 is slower than the Ryzen 9 7900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $368 cheaper!
FX-6300
- Up to 90% cheaper – $40.65 vs $408.48
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall – $0.21 vs $1.68/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall
Ryzen 9 7900
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 7900: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
77%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$408.48
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
