The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 6900HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6300
The Ryzen 9 6900HX is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 6900HX
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rembrandt |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
