In War Thunder, the FX-6300 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 9700X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $260 cheaper!
FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper – $40.65 vs $301.00
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in War Thunder – $0.15 vs $0.82/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in War Thunder
Ryzen 7 9700X
- Up to 39% faster in War Thunder – 367 vs 264 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in War Thunder
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
War Thunder FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
264 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
198 FPS
72%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
367 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
275 FPS
100%
Price, $
$301
13%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 9700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 9700X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 7 9700X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9700X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
