Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3450 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $58.02 vs $126.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 7 5700 - $0.39 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 163 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Buy for $126.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |