The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-7900X, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $266.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 82% cheaper – $58.02 vs $325.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-7900X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-7900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Core i9-7900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$325
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
20%
FX-6300 vs Core i9-7900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-7900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
8 MB
57%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
14 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 14 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |