The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $416.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 88% cheaper – $58.02 vs $475.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-13900F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Core i9-13900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$475
12%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
16%
FX-6300 vs Core i9-13900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
