In Atomfall, the FX-6300 is slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $365 cheaper!
FX-6300
- Up to 90% cheaper – $40.65 vs $405.72
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall – $0.21 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
76%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
