Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $58.02 vs $273.18
- Up to 71% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-14700F - $0.26 vs $0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 38% better in Lost Ark than FX-6300 - 307 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 28 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1393 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
307
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
29%
Price, $
$273.18
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1393 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |