The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $165.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 74% cheaper – $58.02 vs $224.00
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-10700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, $
$224
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
29%
FX-6300 vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$132.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |