In Atomfall, the FX-6300 is slightly slower than the Core i5-680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6300
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Apr 19, 2010
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
Core i5-680
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Core i5-680: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
99%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Core i5-680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Core i5-680 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-680
Apr 19th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.866 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-680 Apr 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2010 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
