In Control, the FX-6300 is same performance as the Celeron G1610. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $8 cheaper!
FX-6300
- Up to 17% cheaper – $40.65 vs $49.00
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Control – $0.16 vs $0.20/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Control
Celeron G1610
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer – Dec 03, 2012 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
80%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
