In Deathloop, the FX-6300 is slightly slower than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6300
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
Celeron 847
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-6300 vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
96%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
