The FX-6300 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $40.77 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 41% cheaper – $58.02 vs $98.79
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
FX-6300 vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
$98.79
58%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
62%
FX-6300 vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
