The FX-6200 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3930K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6200
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
FX-6200 vs Core i7-3930K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
FX-6200 vs Core i7-3930K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i7-3930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i7-3930K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
3-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $583.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
| 3 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
