In Atomfall, the FX-6200 is same performance as the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-6200
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Feb 27, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Core i5-650
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-6200 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
