In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-6200 is faster than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $101 cheaper!
FX-6200
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $32.97 vs $134.08
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.16 vs $0.79/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i3-14100
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-6200 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$134.08
24%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
