In Control, the FX-6200 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $4 more expensive!
FX-6200
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $29.00 vs $32.97
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Control – $0.11 vs $0.13/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-6200 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$32.97
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
85%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6200 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6200 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
