Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $29.65 vs $93.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.27 vs $0.76 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-6100 - 124 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |