In The Callisto Protocol, the FX-6100 is slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $365 cheaper!
FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper – $33.90 vs $399.00
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $0.32 vs $3.04/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in The Callisto Protocol
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 26% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 131 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
FX-6100 vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
104 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
76%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
131 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
8%
Value, $/FPS
$3.04/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
