In Rust, the FX-4350 is same performance as the Xeon W3520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4350
- Is 4 years and 30 days newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 4 years and 30 days newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3520
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Xeon W3520: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Xeon W3520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Xeon W3520 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon W3520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
125W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
