In Deathloop, the FX-4350 is same performance as the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4350
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
