In Rust, the FX-4350 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 219 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 120 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
208 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
82%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
