The FX-4350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 3900XT. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3900XT
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 3900XT for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$375
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
