The FX-4350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 3700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 3700X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$129.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
