In Deathloop, the FX-4350 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $216 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 72% cheaper – $82.71 vs $298.98
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop – $0.37 vs $1.22/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
223 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
91%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
