In Atomfall, the FX-4350 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4350
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 249 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
76%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
