FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-4350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4350
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
