In Rust, the FX-4350 is same performance as the Core i7-960. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $67 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Apr 29, 2013 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 45% cheaper – $82.71 vs $150.00
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in Rust – $0.39 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-960
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i7-960: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
98%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
55%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-960 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-960 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 20th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
