In Control, the FX-4350 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $111 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 57% cheaper – $82.71 vs $194.00
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in Control – $0.33 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in Control
Core i7-8700K
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i7-8700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-8700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i7-8700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
