In Atomfall, the FX-4350 is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $67 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 45% cheaper – $82.71 vs $149.35
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall – $0.43 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-14100
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
82%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
55%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
67%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
