In Rust, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Xeon X5690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4300
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5690
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 211 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Xeon X5690: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
93%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Xeon X5690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Xeon X5690 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X5690
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.466 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.733 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5690 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
95W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
