In Deathloop, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 7900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $352 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 88% cheaper – $49.00 vs $401.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop – $0.21 vs $1.67/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop
Ryzen 9 7900
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Ryzen 9 7900: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
224 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
93%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$401
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
