Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of FX-4300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $48.02 vs $197.91
- Up to 56% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 7600 - $1.09 vs $2.47 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 82% better in Starfield than FX-4300 - 80 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for $197.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |