In Atomfall, the FX-4300 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 225. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-4300
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 225
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 225: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
78%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 225 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core Ultra 5 225 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 225 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $246.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
