In Atomfall, the FX-4300 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $356 cheaper!
FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper – $42.94 vs $399.00
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall – $0.23 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-4300 vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
186 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
86%
Price, $
$42.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
